🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System and Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Order: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then bin him for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.